Lucidity, blueprint of the psyche
I will
explain here a tool for identity analysis, a (self-)diagnostic methodology I
developed and have used with many people and is based on the multi-self state
or substitute identity model of the psyche. This model deals with the fact,
that many of us have more self-states, more identities and are not aware of
these. It’s a quick way to scan the structure of the psyche, pinpoint the
various masks and selves and identify problem areas, and is as such a tool in
talking about who they are with clients, that could be used in relation to
other methodologies. The aim of the tool is to assist people in self-discovery,
the forms used are therefore not to be seen as mandatory questionnaires, but as
guidelines in an interactive process, whereby the client is participating in
discovery of his or her identity structure. More about this in the book
on www.lucsala.nl/ritual (free ebook)
It is thus
not only an application of my substitute identity model of the psyche, but
hinges on something else in diagnostics, the capability to use special
senses to perceive beyond the normal, by the client themselves or the
practitioner/therapist. This is not unique, many therapist and doctors use
intuition with methods like “touch for health” or kinesthetics, but it’s usually not done in a very
systematic way. In the Lucidity approach I use divination (a pendulum, kinesthetics or tactile learning, there are many ways) to
arrive at what could be called the blueprint of a person’s psyche. One
could say my approach is intuitive and
unscientific, but my answer to that would be: it works, gives consistent and
repeatable results, so what?
There are
many ways to look at the psychological profile, identity or character or type
of a person, but most take a long time and use complex rational
‘scientific’ methods with often lengthy questionnaires. They
mostly work from a model and theory that is limited in that it recognizes only
the normal dimensions, ignores the multiple and dynamic character of
identity and personality, or assumes a stable self-image.
Methods and
typologies like Myers-Briggs, the Enneagram of
personalities, Big Five, classical psychoanalysis and even astrology do
indicate a certain generalized type and behavior for each individual and I
appreciate and use what they have to offer but mostly these systems don’t
really point to solutions: how to deal with one’s personality stumbling
blocks and nasty patterns, because they fail to notice we are not always the
same, we can have multiple, substitute identities.
Especially
the Enneagram is a great tool, has internal
consistency and offers great insights, but the way it is usually applied only
deals with our dominant personality, not with the deeper structure of our
psyche. Eli Jaxon-Bear is one of the few who pointed
out, and he based this upon his Advaita Vedanta
notions, that it basically tells you who you are not, your false self. The enneagram is thus potentially also a tool to see the deeper
self, the hidden true me, but is not usually applied in this sense and thus
remains a symptomatic not a fundamental tool.
My interest
has always been to look beyond the shown identity, beyond the assumed self-image.
I wanted a
methodology that would allow me, with the client there for feedback, to quickly
scan the psychological structure of a person, identify problem areas. It would
be helpfull if it could also suggest and evaluate
ways to deal with those. I was looking for an interactive diagnostic tool with
enough detail to identify not only symptoms but also root causes, and would
point at methods or approaches for treatment or therapy.
The normal
methods, like establishing an enneagram type by way
of questionnaires would not give me more than superficial insight in what a
person assumed to be his or her self, so I decided to use a divination tool to
come up with answers and profiles beyond that. This is not uncommon in
alternative medicine, methods like “Touch of Health”, Kinesiology
or Manual Muscle Testing are widely used. Divination with a pendulum is
similar, except that the subject then is not the diviner. This limits the
projection (unconscious manipulation) from the side of the subject, but of
course transfers this problem to the diviner. I am an experienced dowser so I
know the limitations and dangers.
I gave the
method that I developed the name Lucidity: it brings light into situations that
are often rather dark and unclear. It’s not the definite version, as it
still changes and improves over time, this is a ongoing process. The name is
also a play on words, my first name is Luc(ius).
There exists also a Lucidity Institute in the USA that researches lucid
dreaming.
The first
realization and the root of the approach has to do with multiple
sub-personalities or masks. I noted that when I look in a mirror there is not
one person facing me (or asking for advice) but a combination of (subjective)
selves, we have more masks or characters, substitute identities that are the
ego-masks.
Each
sub-personality (character/mask) we have is different, with different talents,
behavior, bodily functions, intelligence etc. but one perceives oneself as a
coherent, undivided person. This poses a problem, but also the solution, for in
the differences between the sub-personalities often lie the key to inner
struggle, the saboteur, inner discourse and psychological problems, even
illnesses.
To
acknowledge that there are more characters or identities, and thus also more
shown identities (masks) in a person beyond the well know false/true self
dichotomy is already quite different from most current thinking, so I had to
find words that would be easy to understand. I use substitute identity,
that’s better than sub-personality, but it’s not the perfect
choice, I know.
Using words
to describe someone are usually not unambigious.
Identity is fairly general, type or mask works, sub personality is dangerous.
The whole existence of multiple self states has not been widely acknowledged,
Jung saw two states in himself, Roberto Assagioli
works with a similar concept, transpersonal therapist Manuel Almendro uses the word character to describe the various
modalities, but sees them not as coherent pattern, as separate
individuals, more as specific pattern of what he calls fractals.
Anyway,
whatever the indication or word, I am talking about different ways someone
deals with the inner and outer worlds, different identities. Different in many
ways, but not perceived as such, maybe only noted as moods or temper.
Given the
fact that there are more characters or identities in a person (at least two, an
inner child and a basic mask) I realized I could use a list of characteristics
for each (substitute)-identity to identify differences. This can be done
without the person present, as an intuitive approximation even for deceased
people where I have some resonance with (like I met Steve Jobs in person), but
prefer a one-on-one presence, as some interaction and feedback facilitates the
process, makes it more self-discovery than diagnosis.
For many
it’s a bit embarrassing to be confronted with what is easily perceived as
a split personality, one immediately thinks about multi personality syndrome or
DID (disassociated identity disorder). Overcoming this defense, making clear
this is not abnormal, is not easy, but pointing out that most everybody
(probably 94% of us) has these multiple substitute identities, although usually
there is a dominant one, helps.
So in the
Lucidity approach this is the first step, explaining this situation. Sometimes
this is easy, sometimes the person finds it hard to accept there are so to
speak more people inside of him or her. Diagrams, examples of people they know
and sometimes some support from relatives or friends, who normally know the
moods or modes, are helpful in this stage. A certain trust and belief in the
system has to be established.
Based on the
more or less accepted notion of an inner child and personality or ego (masks) I
can normally explain to the subject, the person being analyzed, what I was
doing. The challenge is to get the person to understand that he or she is not
only the assumed self, but that there are more substitute identities or
characters inside and expressed in behavior.
Once this is
understood, the work can start, first establishing how many substitute
identities exits, how dominant they are and in what situations they are shown.
Differences between the various masks, characters or self-modalities are
especially significant, they are the cause of many a psychic and somatic issue.
This
appreciation and awareness of the substitute identities in ourselves or others
is normally not understood in the approach of the ‘normal’ medical
profession. Allopathic doctors and most psychiatrists and psychologists simply
lack the insight and tools to describe and quantify these substitute
identities.
Even as many
alternative therapists do understand the importance of the distinction between
child and mask - nearly all traditions state the goal of not identifying with
our ego, personality or mask - there are few systematic ways to explore them in
short order. Methods like Voice Dialogue or PsychoSynthesis
take a lot of time and don’t deal with multiple masks the way I see them –
as defense mechanisms and armor as the result of traumatic experiences.
The goal of
the Lucidity approach is to establish what modalities (substitute identities/
masks) there are in a subject, how they compare with the inner child or core
inner me, and what differences are substantial enough to cause specific
behavior, diseases, imbalances and so forth.
I will start
the Lucidity diagnostic process with a more or less standard form. This is a
matrix where the various characteristics of the inner child and one or more
masks are indicated in a logical order, starting with some basic features like
intelligence, general health etc. I will use subjective readings (a pendulum),
and if necessary give the corresponding reading for people they know, myself or
a public figure, to help the subject see where he or she stands.
There are
obviously differences between what I gauge and how it’s perceived by the
subject/client. This is because the readings I get are based on my internal
calibration, I get numbers that are repeatable by me and consistent but I
don’t always know or understand the scale. It’s learning by
doing.
So when I
give readings (numbers) about social quotient, spiritual frequency, time
perspective, etc. it is also necessary to build up some rapport, explain what
these numbers mean, how they are for well known people, compare them with those
from others.
The subject
has to see that the numbers make sense, that there is some truth to what I
gauge. I make myself vulnerable by sharing details about myself, using me
an example and touchstone, this is part of the process.
Gradually the
items on the list go from superficial towards less obvious hidden
characteristics, but it is important to continually check the results with the
person to build some confidence. The process is not like a laboratory check, it
is an interactive search for the deeper truth about a person.
I could fill
in the form and arrive at a somewhat intuitive diagnostic result without the
person being there, using what in Radionics is called
a witness (a picture etc.) but the best results are obtained in interaction, in
a process of feeling and growing mutual awareness. Then the goal is not
to completely fill in all the details, but use the form to interactively help
the self discovery process, explaining some items more in depth, diverging as
necessary.
Often
it’s enough to point out where the differences and inner paradoxes are to
start of a healing process. Healing or a solution starts with understanding the
underlying mechanism, once “the light goes on” and people realize
the cause of certain problems they change their self-image and often healing
happens without further intervention.
The
fundamental design, the soul part we bring with us to this world at birth (or
at conception) is the inner child or inner me. It holds the original message
contained in our DNA, in the choice of parents and place, and what can be seen
as our karma. It is the scenario our soul has planned, the
‘attractor’, the basis lesson we come to learn.
It has
layers, and the most outer layer is the one that gets wounded in the process of
growing up and coping with the world. The idea that the inner child is totally
perfect and without identity is thus false. There always is a special
something, a talent, a quest, the main reason we are here. Figuring that one
out is very important, for then we can understand why our lives were the way
they are. There is also a deep inner core without identity, but not easily
accessible. It where we want to go in deep ritual state, to access the I
dimension that allows us to contact the otherworld.
The inner
me/child has an outer layer, that interacts with the environment and develops
all kinds of patterns (the fractals Almendro calls
them) to get what it wants or needs, responding to the people and
situation around, usually the mother. As we develop in early childhood, we very
soon (1 to 2 years) start with the defense and adaptation program that then
becomes our first personality, our ego. It is that basic subpersonality which we then gradually start to believe we
are, the ego or false self. I call it the assumed self, as the word ego has
many different connotations.
The ego is
not a negative thing. Usually it forms an effective way to deal with the
circumstances and situation we were born into, we could not do without this ego
system.
And yet this
assumed personality, with traits, drives, behavior and limitations, is
different from - and in most people not well connected to - the original
blueprint, the inner child.
Here an
important extension of the model need to be mentioned. Sometimes (some 70% of
the people I estimate) we develop more personalities or sub-personalities.
Usually this is because of traumatic experiences, such as abuse, accidents or
diseases. Situations where the normal mask cannot handle the situation and a
new defense is needed.
I tend to describe
these as additional masks or characters, a workable generalization. Usually the
first mask is dominant in the sense that it is ‘worn’ most of the
times, additional masks can worn a lot or hardly ever, and depending on
circumstances. When there are a lot of masks, usually the ‘small’
ones can be ignored. They are remnants of special circumstances that might
never or rarely happen again.
In following
the list of characteristics on the form (I do give a copy or the original to
the subject) the person becomes gradually aware of his or her modalities, sees
where they come from, and maybe remembers traumatic experiences. It’s a
process of elucidating the structure of one’s psyche.
It helps
sometimes to explain the model in computer terms, there are two or more
software programs, running the same hardware. Although I detest the notion that
the human mind is nothing but a meat computer, the idea that the same body
(with many automatic programs) has different but internally consistent ways of
interacting, reacting and dealing with the world is useful.
Following the
list I not only explain but gradually show that the same body and brains (and
automatic and autonomous systems of it) by being in these different modes not
only displays different responses, but is a different person or personality.
This is a subpersonality, with its own IQ, sexual
preference, ultimate goals, level of happiness, social patterns, responses and
needs but also with shortcomings, malfunctioning and diseases specific to that
personality or subpersonality. In short, it becomes
clear that the outer personalities (mask or masks) and the inner child state
are not only superficially different modes of being; they are fundamentally
different.
The standard
form printed here is only the first step in the process. As the matrix takes
form more specific questions come up, and the standard form gives way to a more
specific list. The process becomes more personal and the dowsing turns into a
dialogue. Questions and answers follow in a process of finding solutions, going
forward and back, retracing earlier reading data, especially data that seemed
erratic before but can now yield new insights and perspectives. Gradually the
person starts to recognize the various modes, and becomes accustomed to the
idea that one can switch between modes and that the inner child mode offers
different and important options for dealing with life. There one can discern
the true path and scenario of the soul.
Now I believe
that the fundamental differences between child and masks are the cause of many,
if not most, dysfunctioning in body and mind. We
might, after all, have developed defense mechanisms that once were useful, but
become a burden to the health of mind or body. We are different in the
different masks, for instance we might have a different time-perspective (TP)
as Zimbardo uses it, a different enneagram
type etc. It would be great to use such more general indicators, find out what enneagram types we are in the different sub-personalities,
but would require that the client could handle such aggregate models.
Understanding
the differences between the subs is a first step in trying to see what effect
they have. This leads to diagnosing and eventually suggestions for remedy or
therapy. It’s the subject that in fact ‘feels’ what’s
wrong. Becoming aware of the differences and their roots in one’s life or
past is a very important process. Most if not all ailments, syndromes or
problems are symptoms of dysfunctioning, only if we
find the root causes can we really do something.
The standard
list I use is the outcome of many sessions and has changed over time. As one
could make a nearly endless list of personality traits, of functional
parameters and characteristics that could differ between child and mask or
masks, it is important to limit the work to those that are the most
significant.
Obviously
there are indicators that are more practical, general and informative than
others. The problem with all these data, as anyone who has gone through the
medical system knows, lies in the interpretation. How is one to define what is
healthy, what is ill, what is disease, what is a problem and what a talent,
what is normal?
In the normal
(allopathic) medical world one can also do a lot but there the data obtained
(blood test, laboratory test, psychological test, MRI scans, etc.) are in most
cases limited to one mask mode or modality. Interpreting those data ignores
that the person while being tested could be in a mode that’s just not
relevant. Think about having a toothache in one mode, but when sitting in the
dentist chair the pain has disappeared miraculously because one has changed
into another mode/mask.
Obtaining
data from the inner child mode with standard methods is possible but difficult.
Sometimes one unintentionally does get these data because patients are drugged
into their child mode or otherwise regressed into that state.
Normally
however (and apart from some inner child work specialists) no attention is
given to the parameter differences between child and masks.
Because I
believe those differences are the most common cause for malfunctioning or
complaints, this limits the effectiveness of normal medical diagnoses and
treatments.
Two or more personalities or
modalities
I come back
to the notion of multiple subpersonalities. The word
“personalities” or even subpersonalities
is a bit strong and makes one think of Multi Personality Disorder, or
Dissociative Identity Disorder. It is nevertheless used here to indicate
those programs, modes, characters or substitute identities we often see
described as the conscious personality, as opposed to the true self, shadow,
wounded or inner personality, many words are used.
I developed
or extended the idea of multiple substitute identities or masks in this form,
as I discovered in myself and others that these programs are rather independent
modes of being.
Each mode,
which is experienced by others as a separate character, has its own
breath pattern, intelligence, social qualities, sexual orientation, sexual
preferences, talent pool etc., sometimes quite different.
Each mode
draws upon and accesses their own “bag” of experiences, traumas and
reflexes built up in our lifetime and stored in the body and the mind. This
means that in one mode one can see a specific experience as traumatic, in
another mode as just a nuisance. In the one mode one can love the parents, in
another hate their guts.
Automatic responses and switches
In the ego
(mask=persona) mode or modes most of the effects and mechanisms are
unconscious, automatic and cannot be accessed. The reflexes especially happen
very fast, unnoticed, and are hard to catch or pinpoint. We ourselves and
others might notice them, or rather the resulting symptomatic behavior, moods,
stance. Also the switch from one mode to another happens unnoticed, but comes
with a changed behavior.
Making all
this conscious is the way to integrate the mask, for this is the best we can
achieve, it’s not about only going back to the child mode. Becoming aware
of certain patterns we can then adapt a bit, evade the effects, find cognitive
solutions.
Many
therapies like NLP and the many behavioral approaches are effective in changing
some aspects of the (dominant) mask, and adapt it to what the external world
expects or requires. They can be effective in better coping with day-to-day
situations. These adaptations however are superficial, they change the mask,
the self perception and cause changes in behavior, but not the deep
roots.
They do NOT
really change the person inside, the inner child and the higher self. In fact,
by dealing with some symptoms that are only symptoms of deeper fundamental
problems in the psyche, they sometimes keep the person away from becoming aware
of those deeper problems.
There are
many similar therapies that can be used with some effect, the underlying roots
however are not addressed in such symptomatic approaches. Only in the inner
child mode, where the ego is dissolved, can we consciously address the root
issues. By looking at the causes of the effects and relating them to the bag of
experiences and traumas, the then wiser and more pure inner child can integrate
them. Integration is the goal, not denial of the mask or masks, they are useful
tools to deal with the world, but need to be applied in the right way.
The defensive
character of our mask(s) already points at the problem, that therapy is only
effective at the root level when the subject is in an inner child mode. This
however requires the same from the therapist or healer.
It’s
not identified as such, but words as empathic, feeling, comforting, are often
used to indicate therapists who can access such a mode and join their clients
in “being there”. Many ritualistic way of healing by shamans etc.
require that both healer and healer access another state of
consciousness.
The two modes
usually recognized as constituents of the psyche and influencing our thoughts
and behavior are indicated as the conscious and the un/subconscious modes. Such
a model does not map precisely over my model of inner child and ego-masks.
There are subconscious (and deeper unconscious) facets of the inner child that
show up in the ego-masks too. However, talking about this informally, the
conscious/unconscious dichotomy is more easily understood by subjects.
The inner
child is hard to reach, only in dreams and sex do we normally have access.
However, with special techniques like breath work, meditation, yoga, hypnosis and
certain drugs we can reach this state. Here the overlap with ritual is very
clear.
Some people
have more easily access or trained themselves to be there and use this state in
artistic expression, as a healer, clairvoyant etc.
Later in life
the inner child sometimes gets more liberated and the original me, the child
that we once were, is showing more.
A fluid relation
between the various modes, not denial but conscious integration is crucial in
growth towards wisdom. It takes a lot of work however, sometimes illnesses and
suffering, to liberate the inner child and develop it along the spiritual
awareness axis. Our mask states still can and will be triggered unconsciously
but we can learn to recognize the signals.
We might then
discover that it is the deep connection to the higher self and divine oneness
that underlies it all. Again it is clear that therapy and ritual are just two
sides of the same coin. In ritual we also have the possibility, to reach the
inner child state, which I sometimes call the ritual state, a special state of
consciousness.
This explains
why there are rituals and why there will always be rituals, for they are
effective ways of healing and accessing deeper exchange nodes (primes). Rituals
are acts, and therefore reach deeper levels than just language, but this is
recognized in modern psychotherapy, as it was in shamanic healing through the
ages.
Our traumas,
stress, frustrations and “buttons’ are stored both in the body, as
every cell and organ has a memory too (embodied cognition), and in the
psyche.
As an example
of just a small part of a Lucidity form I give some data about Steve Jobs. I
have met him a few times, so there is a connection. In his inner child he is
very creative, very smart, but this disappears in his normal mask, his ego. He
was raised by ‘red neck’ foster parents and had to adapt to their
way of being. One could say he took over their personality. Not very nice, he
was the worst boss one could imagine. But the, also because he experimented a
lot with new age technologies (and mentioned LSD as a life-changing experience)
he was able to connect to his inner child mode and be ‘there’ quite
a lot of the time. This is exceptional and since he had all this talent in that
mode, he could (at home) use it to come up with great ideas, look at products
and feel. He wasn’t a happy trooper and the differences between his two
modes of being were sizeable, so there must have been internal unbalance. The
mask-personality wasn’t nice at all, he mistreated people around him, was
strong-willed and not very social, a bit autistic. By studying the numbers one
can get an idea what kind of person he was, but also that hidden from the
world, but accessible in a conscious way, he was a genius. A large difference
in IQ, usually because of adaptation towards the family level, is usually a
source of much worry, but in Jobs’ case he also had quite a bit of karma
to deal with.
As we grow
up, we develop a personality mode (program) to cope with the outside world, its
demands, logic, irrationalities, adverse conditions etc. This becomes our mask,
the personality we experience as ourselves, as the I, the ego, the operational
mode we identify with and show to the world. It is the outermost layer of our
psyche. It develops from very early childhood, basic personality traits can be
detected before the child is one years old and by age 3 or 4 it has kind of
formed itself. This mask personality is not unchangeable, in fact it develops
and grows and can be changed later in life..
The mask
characteristics are, in my opinion, not a given (nature) but a result of
nurture (education, conditions of growing up) with at most a limited genetic
(DNA) influence. This also means that I believe the characteristics of this
mask personality are not fixed but can be changed or developed.
The mask
strives for outward perfection, structure, evasion of negative emotions, even
the search for some kind of subjective truth, but is also a very good shield,
indeed a mask, used to show an identity that is not our true self. Anxiety,
fear and anger are major drives, and are or can different in different masks.
The usual typology systems are valid within each mask, a system like the enneagram can be used to analyze a specific mask, as long
as one accepts there are other types at work in other masks.
The true
self, the perfect child in us that protected itself by building the mask or
masks but got wounded and damaged in the process, is always still there. It is
however hidden behind our defense patterns against abuse, pressure, bad
conditions, lack of love, lack of touch, all human beings have picked some of
these from the tree of abundant trauma. One could say that they did so with
perfect understanding and by free will, their souls made the choice for incarnation
in this life and with these parents, they created or picked the ingredients for
the resulting mask or masks. From this perspective one could see the
development of the mask and the lifelong struggle to come back to the higher
self as the human condition, the storyline of one’s destiny. And if we
see that even in the same family and with the same bouquet of potential trauma
and abuse, different kids pick different masks, this supports the assumption
that the soul, the ultimate driver of our body-mind-spirit, is in charge of all
this.
Our higher
self, the core of original inner child, is the connection with the divine spark
in us, is in essence a part of the divine. It connects, unites, does not
separate, does not discriminate. It has those divine virtues, love, humbleness,
patience, compassion, courage, wisdom, is creative and is where we communicate
with the otherworld by way of the primes.
Subpersonality, not
a willed state
This subpersonality or modality model is somewhat different from
Roberto Assagioli’s notions of psychosynthesis and the usual view on how substitute
identities work. There they are usually seen as functional adaptations to
situations, like work, relationship, fights etc. In that view, a person can
have many substitute identities and subidentities,
which are supposed to kick in when needed, more or less under the control of
the will. I believe, with quite a different perspective, that the various
behavior modes or masks are formed in childhood or because of traumatic
experiences we couldn’t handle, and the subs will kick in because of
triggers that remind us of the original experiences. They are thus involuntary
but once recognized can be somewhat controlled.
The
methodology I use and developed, the lucidity method, is based on the
assumption that we can by divination measure even intangible parameters,
differentiate them for the personalities or masks and so indicate potential
inner conflicts. The method has been used and validated in hundreds of cases,
not only by, I have trained other to work in a similar way.
The problem
with the method of course is that is subjective and uses a measuring technology
not accepted as scientific. Yet most professional will agree that
understanding, measuring and analyzing the parameters of the ego-system and the
underlying inner child yields valuable insights for therapy and healing.
People can
have different IQs, sexual orientations, time perspectives, etc. in different
(sub)-personalities.
Analysis of
the numerical data for normally intangible and vague qualities like spiritual
resonance, emotional EQ, sexual orientation, happiness, beauty and much more
also gives insight into:
Now the
advantage of using an intuitive method like dowsing is that one is not limited
to obtaining data about the mask, but also about the inner child and this opens
up the possibility to compare. There are also no limitations of time, one can
dowse characteristics as they were before, even for dead people. One can find
averages, peaks, and correlate them, it’s a miraculous way to work. I
have done this for many years and with many people, and gradually developed a
shortlist of those characteristics that are most significant and useful in
diagnosing root problems. This shortlist, amended, expanded and rearranged many
times, has evolved into what I call the Lucidity profile; this is a matrix that
compares a number of essentials for the inner child, the mask - and if
applicable - the subsequent masks. Not every item on that shortlist or profile
is relevant for a given person. It only matters if a substantial difference is
detected between mask(s) and child.
The
characteristics of these processes, programs and states of being can be
represented by numerical scales and values, different ones for the different
masks. I use a standard form to do so and use a pendulum to find values for the
items on the list, they might be the same or different for the various
personality masks.
The question
here is what to fill in, beyond notions like good, average, bad, for it
concerns vague notions like emotional EQ, health, well-being, mostly vaguely
defined capabilities. I use my personal intuition here, measured with a
pendulum. The pendulum is my contact medium with my inner self and thus with
the otherworldly dimensions where I believe these things reside.
Here the
notion of relative scales is important. It is not essential to use a scale or
calibration that is universal, as long as one can repeat the outcome of even a
subjective measurement. If I call a certain painting beautiful I can give it a
rating, let’s say 8 (out of 10). Now another painting is less attractive,
so I give it a 6. What makes this a practical approach is that later I can
classify paintings based on this scale, on the condition that my subjective
scale still holds and I would give the paintings the same value or ranking when
repeating the evaluation. Consistency and repeatability can make a subjective
scale and ranking practical and effective. Even esoteric notions as
enlightenment, level of awareness, happiness and in fact all dimensions of our
human “being” can in such a way be represented by numerical values.
Those values are subjective but repeatable and give a deeper insight in how our
psyche-body-mind works.
The data
obtained are very much related to what the dowser feels, knows or senses about
a specific item, he is the one behind the calibration so to say. Take IQ, there
are many different tests to measure this and even those have to be updated
every few years. As the test battery becomes familiar, there is a kind of
inflation in IQ scores.
So when I (or
another practitioner) obtain numbers they are what the dowser intuitively
senses and assign numbers too. For me, concerning IQ grading, a university
level IQ is around 126, and the highest IQ score I have seen is 156 (Leonardo da Vinci). The premise that the average IQ is 100
doesn’t seem to apply anymore, at least for the Netherlands and for me. I
seems to ‘gauge’ in my dowsing that a functioning citizen these
days needs to have at least an IQ of 114 (I presume that worldwide 100 is still
the average). Also the notion of IQ is limited, it’s only an indication
of the rational and logical, other things like social quotient, spiritual
awareness level, sensitivity, connectedness etc. play a role. All humans come
with a full deck, I believe, even if they are labeled differently.
I use numbers
and quantitative data, being a physicist by training. For the purpose of
finding the important differentials between child and mask modes it would
probably suffice to indicate whether there is a significant difference at all,
without needing to put a number to it.
The
disadvantage of quantitative data is that the client is easily triggered into
disputing them, thinks him or herself more intelligent, happy, healthy or
whatever and quarrels about what everything means. On the other hand, some
leeway in how hard the data are usually leads to a meaningful discussion about
what is at issue, and becomes part of the awareness process that the Lucidity
Program in essence is.
Now the above
postulates are quite specific and somewhat revolutionary, especially the ones
where I attribute separate IQ’s, social capabilities etc. to the
different programs /substitute identities/modes.
In case of
extreme multiple personality syndrome this is generally accepted, but it is
quite a statement to argue this applies to nearly everybody.
The basis of personality is the
breath
I believe
there is a root mechanism at work in our body. This is the breath, as this is
the fundamental energy mechanism. So I am suggesting that IQ, personality
traits, body postures and looks etc. are caused by the breath pattern. This in turn
is driven by our psyche, the master and charioteer of our selves complex. So I
believe it is the psyche (mind if you like) that causes our breath and
chi-energy to move through our system as it does. Here I differ again from the
“Western” understanding. Of course those well versed in yoga and
what Chi does will see the resonance with “eastern” wisdom. Incidentally,
this means that changing one’s personality can be achieved by a strict
breath regime, as achieved in monastic situations by chanting and mantras, but
also happens when certain muscles are afflicted by an accident or by wearing a
tight corset.
Dowsing, divination, intuition
There are
ways of obtaining data that are not widely accepted in scientific circles or
the medical world, but will yield reproducible and significant indicators about
the physical and psychological state of a person.
Apart from
the intuition and the talents of an experienced therapist or practitioner, who
at a certain level knows or feels what a patient radiates, there have been
developed over time alternative methods such as Kinesthetics,
Touch for Health, Radionics and all kinds of dowsing
or divination methods. Often these are classified by skeptics as mere
superstition and fraud but they do yield reproducible results. The alternative
medicine world uses these techniques a lot, and they help to understand the
condition of the client, even as one accepts that the results are easily
tainted by projection or prejudice.
Explanation of the items on the model
form
The items on
the model form (see illustration) need some explanation, as they are short and
abbreviated indicators only. Let’s start with time (spend in the mask
mode). Most people spend very little time in the inner child mode, and are
mostly in their normal daily (first) mask. Only in dreaming, under severe
stress, in cases of disease or when having sex does one normally let go of the
mask and revert to the inner child mode. However, one can also enter into this
state with meditation, certain exercises, concentration and with certain
(psychoactive) drugs. An average person is only some 2-5% of the time in his
child state. For people who have a higher proportion of time in that mode,
there are usually places or situations where that state is more common, such as
the garden, meditation, sport, painting or singing.
When there is
more than one (sub) identity and thus more mask-states, the same applies -
there are times and situations where the one personality or identity prevails.
This can be at home, at work, maybe with a certain person or during certain
activities. This can give a good indication for where this mask
originates.
Another good
starting point is looking at the client’s general and psychological
health. This will not normally be more than a few percent off from the healthy
100% score, but a substantial difference between child and mask levels might
indicate were the root of the affliction lies. When a health problem is more in
the child than in the mask, it indicates that the problem lies in the genetic
or karmic load, and is usually harder to cure. Problems in the mask or masks
have their roots in traumas, events or accidents in that mask state, and are
usually easier. Here again we come across the notion that inner child problems
can only be addressed in the inner child mode. This was well understood in the
shamanic tradition, where both the client and the shaman have to get into a trance
state (inner child mode) to see and heal the problem.
Spiritual
awareness frequency or level is the first of the more esoteric indicators. It
indicates at what cognitive level (6th chakra) one understands the spiritual,
and the numbers indicate at what chakra level that is. There are other similar
indicators with the same numbering approach, such as sexual awareness (2nd
chakra) and magical/power awareness (3rd chakra). They sometimes differ between
child and mask, and these indicators also give a general idea about where a
person is in his development.
Again it has
to be stated that the absolute readings are not so important. It’s the
differential between child and mask(s) that causes the problems and offers a
starting point for further diagnostics and therapy.
L. Sala 2014/2016
mindlifttv@gmail.com
www.lucsala.nl